Despite India’s impressive economic growth rates in the mid-2000s, the long-term magnitude and sustainability of this progress remains uncertain. India’s rapid population expansion requires that the country sustain long-term growth to enable job creation over time. For the country to achieve this enduring trajectory, India must correctly identify the economic fundamentals behind such growth. This should include both short-term, cyclical barriers and long-term, structural impediments that hold it back. Articulating a set of policy priorities and guiding principles that address these issues is the best way forward for India’s future economic prospects.
Hurdles to Long-Term Economic Growth
- India’s high-growth phase of 2003–2008 had much to do with growth-friendly global economic conditions that have since run their course.
- The country’s domestic structural deficiencies—namely poor human resource capabilities; a narrow and predominantly informal industrial base; and a fragmented, low-productivity primary sector—keep a lid on growth and a floor on inflation.
- India also faces formidable long-term headwinds due to premature deindustrialization, the limitations of a services-led growth model, the plateauing of global trade, stagnation in developed economies, and the costs associated with climate change.
- The country’s state capacity deficiencies amplify the effects of these constraints.
- These hurdles must be seen in light of favorable tailwinds such as low commodity prices, China’s economic slowdown, and India’s relative attractiveness as an investment destination.
Policy Recommendations
Embrace a feasible growth model. Lasting economic progress is best achieved by realistically assessing India’s structural impediments and growth potential. The government must accept that sustained growth rates of 8 percent or more are likely out of reach, and it should resist short-term growth strategies that rely on bubbles and fads by instead promising less and delivering more. The government should vigilantly steer clear of both state-led import substitution and overreliance on market-based policy prescriptions.
Prioritize growth-friendly policies. The Indian government should pursue reforms in the areas of higher and lower education; urban governance; housing, land, credit, and labor markets; and infrastructure contracting. It should also seek to shrink the informal economy and expand the tax base, while also improving state capacity and personnel management.
Foster greater federalism. Indian states should be allowed to engage both cooperatively and competitively with the central government and with each other. Proactive bottom-up actions by state governments will be needed to effectively scale up the fragmented agricultural sector and industrial production.
Comments(3)
Depending upon how one describes or even defines growth, things change in how they are written. I personally would describe growth as a state's welfare schemes matching its salary structure it envisages for its employees - given that public funds give those salaries from the tax-payers' money. Obvious enough comparison since the state's salaries from state or government jobs can only occur around the state's cognition of the basic financial needs for a life with dignity. Given that welfare schemes are all about the same - differences occurring in welfare payments can be more - say unemployment benefits - when government jobs/salaries will show differences based upon role-responsibility parameters. This scenario of course envisages a functional state and not dysfunctional ones like India where this very cognition never seems to have occurred to its primitive populaces or their leaderships or even its educated elites! But given it being a South Asian state - China comes to one's mind as easier comparison with India over cognition and conceptions about growth. One supposes that India fails miserably again to begin discussions about and over concepts of growth - except corruption (crime-terror need mentioned separately for the Indians or will invite umbrage & violence - including economic ones) and the population. Outside these two - one doubts if the Indians have any scarce cognition of the meaning of the term politics, state and governance. Never did. Given what it considers growth - well, the basic parameters I have suggested including cognition stump it again.
Not only the failed Policies but its permanent role as a terrorist state, a hegemonic state in the hands of low intellect people such as N. Modi, are guarantees for its collapse. As I have been repeatedly pointing out that one fine morning, despite all the scaffoldings erected around it by the west, the world is bound to hear that India has Imploded. There is no way it can sustain. All the imperatives are in contradiction of its so far prolonged existence. West really need to think impassionately, realistically and stop wasting its dwindling resources on a dying elephant. shakir2.wordpress.com
Yes It CAN: India Can Grow: Why Couldn't IT?
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.